Ohm's law
From Freepedia
Ohm's law, named after its discoverer Georg Ohm [1], states that the potential difference or Voltage drop V between the ends of a conductor and the current I flowing through the conductor are proportional at a given temperature:
- <math>
\frac{V}{I} = R </math> The equation yields the proportionality constant R, which is the electrical resistance of the device.
Contents |
Overview
The law is strictly true only for resistors whose resistance does not depend on the applied voltage, which are called ohmic or ideal resistors or ohmic devices. Fortunately, the conditions where Ohm's law holds are very common. However, if R is assumed to be constant, then Ohm's law is never completely accurate for "real world" devices because no real device is an ohmic device for every voltage and current. At some level, the device will open or short, for example, by burning up or arcing.
The relation <math>V / I = R</math> even holds for non-ohmic devices, but then the resistance R depends on V and is no longer a constant. To check whether a given device is ohmic or not, one plots V versus I and checks that the curve is a straight line or not. The Ohm's law equation is often stated as
- <math>
V = I \cdot R </math> in part because that is the variation very commonly used with resistors.
Physics
Physicists often use the continuum form of Ohm's Law:
- <math>
\mathbf{J} = \sigma \cdot \mathbf{E} </math> where J is the current density (current per unit area), σ is the conductivity (which can be a tensor in anisotropic materials) and E is the electric field. The common form <math>V = I \cdot R</math> used in circuit design is the macroscopic, averaged-out version.
The equation above is only valid in the reference frame of the conducting material. If the material is moving at velocity v relative to a magnetic field B, a term must be added as follows
- <math>
\mathbf{J} = \sigma \cdot \left( \mathbf{E} + \mathbf{v}\times\mathbf{B} \right) </math> The analogy to the Lorentz force is obvious, and in fact Ohm's law can be derived from the Lorenz force and the assumption that there is a drag on the charge carriers proportional to their velocity.
In a sense, Ohm's law is trivial, because resistivity is defined in terms of current and voltage. The actual content of the law is that in many cases of practical interest, the resistance of a component is not a function of the applied voltage. There are exceptions, of course, such as diodes, which have a non-linear current-voltage relationship. A perfect metal lattice would have no resistivity, but a real metal has crystallographic defects, impurities, multiple isotopes, and thermal motion of the atoms. Electrons scatter from all of these, resulting in resistance to their flow.
Temperature effects
When the temperature of the conductor increases, the collisions between electrons and atoms increase. Thus as a substance heats up because of electricity flowing through it (or by any heating process), the resistance will increase. The resistance of an Ohmic substance depends on temperature in the following way:
- <math>
R = \frac{L}{A} \cdot \rho = \frac{L}{A} \cdot \rho_0 (\alpha (T - T_0) + 1) </math> where ρ is the resistivity, L is the length of the conductor, A is its cross-sectional area, T is its temperature, <math>T_0</math> is a reference temperature (usually room temperature), and <math>\rho_0</math> and <math>\alpha</math> are constants specific to the material of interest. In the above expression, we have assumed that L and A remain unchanged within the temperature range.
It is worth mentioning that temperature dependence does not make a substance non-ohmic, because at a given temperature R does not vary with voltage or current (<math>V / I = \mathrm{constant}</math>).
Intrinsic semiconductors exhibit the opposite temperature behavior, becoming better conductors as the temperature increases. This occurs because the electrons are bumped to the conduction energy band by the thermal energy, where they can flow freely and in doing so they leave behind holes in the valence band which can also flow freely.
Extrinsic semiconductors have much more complex temperature behaviour. First the electrons (or holes) leave the donors (or acceptors) giving a decreasing resistance. Then there is a fairly flat phase in which the semiconductor is normally operated where almost all of the donors (or acceptors) have lost thier electrons (or holes) but the number of electrons and the number of electrons that have jumped right over the energy gap is negligable compared to the number of electrons (or holes) from the donors (or acceptors). Finally as the temperature increases further the carriers that jump the energy gap becomes the dominant figure and the material starts behaving like an intrinsic semiconductor.
AC circuits
For an AC circuit Ohm's law can be written <math>\mathbf{V} = \mathbf{I} \cdot \mathbf{Z}</math>, where V and I are the oscillating phasor voltage and current respectively and Z is the complex impedance for the frequency of oscillation.
In a transmission line, the phasor form of Ohm's law above breaks down because of reflections. In a lossless transmission line, the ratio of voltage and current follows the complicated expression
- <math>
Z(d) = Z_0 \frac{Z_L + j Z_0 \tan(\beta d)}{Z_0 + j Z_L \tan(\beta d)} </math>, where d is the distance from the load impedance <math>Z_L</math> measured in wavelengths, β is the wavenumber of the line, and <math>Z_0</math> is the characteristic impedance of the line.
Relation to heat conduction
The equation for the propagation of electricity formed on Ohm's principles is identical with that of Jean-Baptiste-Joseph Fourier for the propagation of heat; and if, in Fourier's solution of any problem of heat-conduction, we change the word temperature to electric potential and write electric current instead of flux of heat, we have the solution of a corresponding problem of electrical conduction. The basis of Fourier's work was his clear conception and definition of thermal conductivity. But this involves an assumption: that, all else being the same, the flux of heat is strictly proportional to the gradient of temperature. Although undoubtedly true for small temperature-gradients, it is not clear that it generalizes. An exactly similar assumption is made in the statement of Ohm's law: other things being alike, the strength of the current is at each point proportional to the gradient of electric potential. It happens, however, that with our modern methods it is much easier to test the accuracy of the assumption in the case of electricity than for heat.
History [2]
Prior to Ohm's work, a qualitative relationship between voltage and current was worked out by Henry Cavendish. Cavendish experimented with Leyden jars and glass tubes of varying diameter and length filled with salt solution. He measured the current by noting how strong of a shock he felt as he completed the circuit with his body. Cavendish wrote that "resistance is directly as the velocity" (by "velocity" he meant what we would now call current density). Cavendish's results were unknown until Maxwell published them in 1879.
Ohm did his work on resistance in the years 1825 and 1826. He drew considerable inspiration from Fourier's work on heat conduction in the theoretical explanation of his work. For experiments, he initially used voltaic piles, but later used a thermocouple as this provided a more stable voltage source in terms of internal resistance and constant potential difference. He used a galvanometer to measure current, and knew that the voltage between the thermocouple terminals was proportional to the junction temperature. He then added test wires of varying length, diameter, and material to complete the circuit. He found that his data could be modeled through the equation
- <math>X = \frac{a}{b + l}</math>,
where X was the reading from the galvanometer, l was the length of the test conductor, a depended only on the thermocouple junction temperature, and b was a constant of the entire setup. From this, Ohm determined his eponymous law and published his results in [1].
Ohm's law was one of the first and probably the most important early quantitative descriptions of the physics of electricity. Though today it is so well known we may think it is obvious, it is not. It is remarkably hard to convince someone that the law is true if he or she plays the devil's advocate. When Ohm first published his work, he met a hostile reception from critics. They called his work a "web of naked fancies" and proclaimed that Ohm was "a professor who preached such heresies was unworthy to teach science." The prevailing scientific philosophy in Germany at the time, lead by Hegel, said that nature is so well ordered that experiments are unnecessary, and that one can arrive at scientific truth through reasoning alone. Also, Ohm's brother Martin, a mathematician, was battling the German educational system. These factors hindered the acceptance of Ohm's work, and his work did not become widely accepted until the 1840s. Fortunately, Ohm received recognition for his contributions to science well before he died.
See also
References
[1] Mathematical work on the electrical circuit from 1827 - Die galvanische Kette, mathematisch bearbeitet
[2] Sanford P. Bordeau. Volts to Hertz...the Rise of Electricity. Burgess Publishing Company, Minneapolis, MN. pp.86-107.
External links
- Calculation of Ohm's law · The Magic Triangle
- Calculation of electric power, voltage, current and resistance
