Superpower

From Freepedia

This article is about superpowers in the context of international relations. For superhuman abilities possessed by fictional characters, known as super powers, see special attack.

A superpower is a state with the ability to influence events and project power on a super scale. It was a term applied to the United States and the Soviet Union after the end of World War II. Any retrospective application of the term to an earlier Great Power or Global Empire is anachronistic.

Contents

Origins

At the end of the Second World War, the USSR and the United States emerged as the main two dominant powers on the global scene.

As the majority of the war was fought far from the United States' national boundaries, it did not suffer the industrial destruction or massive civilian casualties which marked the wartime situation of the countries in Europe or Asia, and during the war the U.S. had built up a strong industrial and technological infrastructure which had greatly advanced their military strength into a primary position.

Following the war, much of Europe had also been occupied by another Allied power, the Soviet Union under Josef Stalin. Despite attempts to create multinational coalitions or legislative bodies (such as the United Nations), increasingly it became clear that both the USA and the USSR were the dominant political and economic powers of the newly emerging Cold War, and had very different visions about what the postwar world ought to look like.

The term "superpower" was first used in this context in 1930, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, but did not pick up as a primarily descriptive term for the USA and USSR until the immediate postwar years (in the 1920s the term was used to describe electrification). It implied that these two nations were part of an emerging bipolar world, in contrast with a previous multipolar world. Whether a true reflection or not, a number of nations undertook various programs to guarantee their own independent "superpower" status, such as the development of nuclear weapons by the United Kingdom, France, and China, as conscious attempts for military independence from the USA and USSR as well as a rite of passage for being a "world player".

The idea that the Cold War period revolved around only two nations, or even only two blocs, has been seriously challenged by scholars in the post-Cold War era, who have noted that the bipolar world only exists if one ignores all of the various movements and conflicts which occurred without influence from either of the two so-called superpowers. Additionally, much of the conflict between the superpowers was fought in "proxy wars", which more often than not involved issues far more complex than the standard Cold War oppositions.

After the Soviet Union disintegrated in the early 1990s, the term hyperpower has been applied to the United States as the sole remaining superpower of the Cold War era. This term was coined by French foreign minister Hubert Védrine in the 1990s. The validity of classifying the USA as a hyperpower is controversial. One notable opponent to this theory, Samuel P. Huntington, rejects this theory in favor of a multipolar balance of power.

United States

The United States headed NATO (also referred to as the First World or, sometimes, as the "Western Bloc", as compared to the Eastern Bloc) during the Cold War. In the post-Cold War era, the United States is the world's sole remaining superpower, with the world's largest economy, and spending more on the military than the next twelve countries combined. However, due to the size of its economy, the United States actually spends a far smaller percentage of its Gross National Product on its military than many countries, even as it outspends its nearest rivals in absolute terms--a fact that testifies to the USA's status as a global hyperpower.

Soviet Union

The Soviet Union was the United States' superpower rival during the Cold War. The Soviet Union was not just a superpower rival, but also an ideological rival, representing the ideology of Communism in opposition to the capitalism of the west. The Soviet Union headed the Warsaw Pact and was commonly known as the Eastern Bloc or the Second World. The Soviet Union was a military and political superpower, economically it rated as a major power with emerging power similarities.

Criteria defining the status of a superpower

  • Superior economic power, characterized by access to raw materials, volume and productivity of the domestic market, a leading position in world trade as well as global financial markets, innovation and the ability to accumulate capital.
  • A large population, high level of education, well-developed infrastructure and a pronounced cultural and economic ability to shape the regions around them as well as the ones under direct control.
  • Pre-eminent military ability, characterized by relative invulnerability, the ability to deter or cause great damage and project military might globally.
  • Having a functioning political system capable of mobilizing resources for world political goals.

Potential superpowers

These are countries that many observers believe may attain superpower status within this century.

China

The People's Republic of China is often considered to be the most likely candidate due to its population (the world's largest) and to its rapidly growing economy. China's GDP has grown at a rate of about 9 percent per annum for more than 25 years (although recently the government has sought to slow this growth to prevent a crash), the fastest growth rate for a major economy in recorded history. In the same period of time, it has moved 300 million people out of poverty and quadrupled the average Chinese person's income--yet China's per capita median income is still below that of traditional developing nations like Mexico and Turkey. China also has a significant nuclear deterrent and the largest army worldwide; however, China's military is still dwarfed by that of the United States, whose military spending outstrips that of its next major competitors combined and which occupies military bases in hundreds of nations around the world, some of which encircle nations like China and Russia. China was the third country (after Russia and the USA) to send humans into space. Though only three nations currently have operational land-based ICBM systems--the United States, Russia, and China--it is the USA that possesses the most lethal strategic capability, as it has a more reliable arsenal than Russia and a massive numerical edge in ICBMs over China. Another important factor is the strong and economically influential Chinese diaspora around the world, especially in South East Asia.

Russia

Russia still possesses some attributes of a world power, notably including the world's largest arsenal of strategic nuclear weapons. It also has the proven ability to conduct manned space travel. Perhaps most importantly, it is the geographically largest country of the world and has control over a variety of strategic raw materials. Russia still has a clear capacity for destructive force, which in light of the current delicate political situation is not calculable beyond the medium-term. As one of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council, Russia also has notable political influence in the world. However, Russia's economy is generally thought to be unstable and less competitive on a global scale. The population has been shrinking since the fall of the Soviet Union and is predicted to fall even lower within the next 10 years. A major brain drain of Russian scientists has aided the fall of Russia, but if the economy can be repaired it could possibly be restored to power.

India

Similar to China, India has a population of over one billion, nuclear weapons, the world's 2nd largest land-force and 4th largest airforce, as well as a thriving economy (4th largest in PPP). India also enjoys the advantage of a large and well-educated English-speaking workforce. The biggest obstacle: India is still a "developing" country in many respects with poor infrastructure, a huge poor and under-educated lower class that has a tremendous gap with the middle and upper classes; widespread corruption, brain-drain, social and ethnic tensions as well as potential conflict with its neighbor and rival, Pakistan. Despite India's widespread poverty, the Indian middle class consists of approximately 500 million people and poverty levels have been falling consistently since the '90s. Today, approximately 20% of India's population lives in poverty. It is thought that India's democratic foundations ensure some kind of long term government stability.

European Union

The European Union contains the former world powers United Kingdom, Germany and France. If counted as a single unit, the E.U. would have the largest economy in the world, as well as formidable military potential. Thanks to its highly developed economies, Europe is a leading place for investment, science, and technology. The EU already has a tremendous cultural, political and economical attraction for surrounding states. At present, transitionally industrial countries such as Croatia and Turkey are actively seeking full EU membership. The political and military fragmentation presents the greatest obstacle to the EU's status as a single superpower. This status would likely depend on further progress in European integration and federalization. This is marred by the fact that large proportions of some of the member states, namely the United Kingdom, are more against the European Union than for further intergration. Future political developments will determine the place of the EU in world events.

United South America

Brazil has a large population, a relatively developed research and development sector and the potential to form the core of a united South America. It is presently campaigning for a permanent seat in the UN Security Council. However, Brazil suffers from many problems typical of developing countries, such as poor infrastructure, poverty, a massive gap between the rich and poor, an unstable economy, disease, famine, widespread corruption, and inefficiency. The South American Community of Nations has the potential to be a more likely superpower. A community based on the EU and representing a united South America, both economically and militarily, could comprise a new power after development has occurred. The division between Portuguese-speaking Brazil and the Spanish-speaking remainder of the continent is seen as a major obstacle to accomplishing this.



Views
Personal tools
In other languages
Similar Links